Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,125,646 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $108,926, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,783, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $97,311, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $67,326, a difference of 6.3%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $52,649, a difference of 7.7%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $120,301, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.6%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.87%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.3%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.59%), college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.1%).