Creek vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Hmong
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,684,644 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.936. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.155% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 155.4 Hmong.
Creek vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $84,258, a difference of 12.6%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $75,839, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $88,115, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.1%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $48,254, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $35,498, a difference of 6.2%).
Income Metric | Creek | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.7% |
Creek vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 17.4%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Creek vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 75.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Hmong |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Creek vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 81.7% |
Creek vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.4%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.30%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Hmong |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Creek vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.79%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Creek vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Creek vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Hmong |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.4% |