Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,471,915 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 18.7 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,709 compared to $29,031, a difference of 95.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $66,529, a difference of 92.6%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $59,159, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 14.2%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $42,380, a difference of 46.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $47,722, a difference of 50.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 159.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 154.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 151.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 50.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 57.6%), and single mother poverty (24.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 65.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 133.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 112.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 109.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 118.4%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 82.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.65, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.9%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 123.1%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 116.9%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.25%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 88.9%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 25.4%).