White/Caucasian vs Native Hawaiian Female Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Native Hawaiian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Native Hawaiians
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Native Hawaiian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,828,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 7.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 10.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 33.9% | 30.4% |
| Range | 23.6% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 12.6% |
| Median | 16.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |