Navajo vs British Female Poverty
COMPARE
Navajo
British
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Navajo
British
23.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs British Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,729,638 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 23.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 91.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | British |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 73.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 72.1% | 97.3% |
| Mean | 28.0% | 18.5% |
| Median | 26.3% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.9% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 18.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 4.6%), Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and Crow (22.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |
Demographics Similar to British by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |