Central American Indian vs Australian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Australian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Australians
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Australian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,040,737 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 44.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Australian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 94.5% | 78.1% |
| Range | 93.2% | 77.2% |
| Mean | 26.1% | 14.9% |
| Median | 20.8% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |