Brazilian vs Crow Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Crow
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Crow
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Crow Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,523,574 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,998,568 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 32.4%, a difference of 61.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Crow |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 15.4% |
| Maximum | 58.7% | 61.5% |
| Range | 54.4% | 46.1% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 39.3% |
| Median | 19.7% | 40.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 48.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 19.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 11.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.7%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |