Italian vs Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Italian
Yugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Italians
Yugoslavians
64.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
4.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
81.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 575,110,373 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,722,501 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 65.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 34.7% | 32.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 84.8% |
| Range | 65.3% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 67.3% | 61.4% |
| Median | 65.2% | 64.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 55.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.9% | 67.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 10.8% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Italians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Vietnamese (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Austrian (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Norway (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Slavic (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Lebanese (64.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Chinese | 7.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Africans | 5.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Slavs | 4.9 /100 | #233 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Vietnamese | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Austrians | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 4.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Italians | 4.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Lebanese | 3.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 3.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 3.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 3.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 3.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 3.2 /100 | #243 | Tragic 64.5% |
| Tsimshian | 3.1 /100 | #244 | Tragic 64.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Czech (65.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
| Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |