Immigrants from China vs Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,121,912 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.715 and weighted average of 65.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,602,231 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.34%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Costa Rican
Minimum	28.6%	40.9%
Maximum	85.0%	89.9%
Range	56.4%	49.0%
Mean	63.0%	64.5%
Median	64.1%	65.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	61.2%	60.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.1%	69.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.0%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.0%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Costa Ricans by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Bhutanese (65.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Guamanian/Chamorro (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%
Bhutanese	86.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	85.7 /100 \| #149	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	81.9 /100 \| #150	Excellent 65.4%
Czechs	81.5 /100 \| #151	Excellent 65.4%
Yugoslavians	81.3 /100 \| #152	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| China	80.5 /100 \| #153	Excellent 65.4%