Celtic vs Nigerian Family Households
COMPARE
Celtic
Nigerian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Celtics
Nigerians
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Nigerian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,466,874 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Nigerian |
| Minimum | 38.1% | 41.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 85.2% |
| Range | 61.9% | 44.1% |
| Mean | 67.4% | 67.1% |
| Median | 65.8% | 66.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 62.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Nigerians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |