Seminole vs Cajun Male Disability
COMPARE
Seminole
Cajun
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Seminole
Cajuns
14.7%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Cajun Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,308,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,697,026 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.5%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Cajun |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 8.4% |
| Maximum | 46.2% | 34.1% |
| Range | 37.9% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 20.2% | 17.7% |
| Median | 19.0% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Seminole and Cajuns by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Yuman (14.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Tohono O'odham (14.6%, a difference of 0.78%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.78%), Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Navajo (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Chippewa (14.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Tohono O'odham (14.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |