Bulgarian vs Zimbabwean Disability
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Zimbabwean
Disability
Disability Comparison
Bulgarians
Zimbabweans
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Zimbabwean Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,630,627 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.32%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 23.7% | 21.8% |
| Range | 21.9% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 11.1% |
| Median | 10.7% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Zimbabweans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Laotian (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% |