Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Chickasaw
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 26.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 38.6% |
| Range | 23.9% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 18.1% |
| Median | 11.5% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |