Immigrants from Somalia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Somalia
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Somalia
Chickasaw
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Somalia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,101,870 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 7.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Somalia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 56.1% | 38.6% |
Range | 50.6% | 36.7% |
Mean | 19.1% | 18.1% |
Median | 17.0% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Somalia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Somalia are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |