Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Bangladesh
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,545,805 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 31.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 39.9% |
Range | 23.9% | 37.8% |
Mean | 11.9% | 16.3% |
Median | 11.5% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 21.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 8.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Yaqui (16.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Zaire (16.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Blackfeet (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Latin America (16.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |