Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,156,546 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 35.8% | 38.6% |
| Range | 34.7% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 18.1% |
| Median | 16.0% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Haiti are Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |