Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,784,385 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.65%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.23% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 23.3% |
Range | 23.9% | 23.1% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |