Navajo vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Navajo
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Navajo
Chickasaw
23.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,729,638 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 23.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 50.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 73.5% | 38.6% |
| Range | 72.1% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 28.0% | 18.1% |
| Median | 26.3% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.9% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 4.6%), Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and Crow (22.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |