Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Chickasaw
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 30.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 38.6% |
Range | 19.5% | 36.7% |
Mean | 11.0% | 18.1% |
Median | 10.7% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Austrian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |