Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Chickasaw
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,538,293 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 73.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.84% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 15.2% |
Range | 12.1% | 14.8% |
Mean | 1.9% | 5.4% |
Median | 1.6% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.43% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Korea (1.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Israel (1.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |