Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from England
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from England
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from England Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 72.8% |
Range | 23.9% | 70.1% |
Mean | 11.9% | 16.7% |
Median | 11.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from England by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |