Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Chickasaw
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Immigrants from China
Chickasaw
26.7%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,702,733 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261 and weighted average of 26.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 6.5% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 55.3% | 60.4% |
Range | 48.9% | 57.6% |
Mean | 27.2% | 29.3% |
Median | 27.6% | 28.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.4% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.9% | 36.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by Wage/Income Gap
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Iraq (26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (26.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Portugal (26.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (26.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Mongolian (26.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 26.5% |
Egyptians | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 26.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 12.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 26.6% |
Arabs | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 26.6% |
Mongolians | 11.4 /100 | #211 | Poor 26.6% |
Iraqis | 11.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 26.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants | China | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 26.7% |
Yugoslavians | 9.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 9.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 26.7% |
Brazilians | 9.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 9.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 8.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 8.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Spain | 8.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 26.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 2.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 27.3% |