Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Chickasaw
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 38.6% |
Range | 42.0% | 36.7% |
Mean | 16.9% | 18.1% |
Median | 14.0% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |