Taiwanese vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Taiwanese
Celtics
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Taiwanese vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,618,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 17.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Taiwanese | Celtic |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 45.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.3% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 33.1% |
| Median | 18.1% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Sweden (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |