Soviet Union vs Palestinian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Palestinian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Palestinians
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Palestinian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,371,597 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.79%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Palestinian |
Minimum | 0.56% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 27.9% |
Range | 25.7% | 27.3% |
Mean | 9.6% | 12.0% |
Median | 9.2% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 14.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Palestinians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |