Macedonian vs Jordanian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Jordanian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Jordanians
18.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Jordanian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,464,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 0.69%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 34.8% |
| Range | 37.0% | 33.7% |
| Mean | 17.9% | 17.3% |
| Median | 17.6% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Jordanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |