Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ethiopian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Ethiopian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Ethiopians
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ethiopian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,545,805 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,083,750 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 23.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 39.9% | 30.1% |
| Range | 37.8% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 12.6% |
| Median | 14.2% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Yaqui (16.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Zaire (16.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Blackfeet (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Latin America (16.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |