American vs Tsimshian Female Poverty
COMPARE
American
Tsimshian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Americans
Tsimshian
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,452,032 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 11.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | American | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 92.7% | 27.8% |
| Range | 90.0% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 23.2% | 14.0% |
| Median | 19.4% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |