Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Oceania
47.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
77.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,712,182 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 47.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 37.5% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 94.1% | 91.9% |
| Range | 56.6% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 52.0% | 44.8% |
| Median | 48.2% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.2% | 40.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.9% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Pakistani (47.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Paraguayan (47.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Vietnam (47.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Cajun (47.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Norway (47.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 81.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.7 /100 | #135 | Good 47.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 78.2 /100 | #136 | Good 47.2% |
| Paraguayans | 77.8 /100 | #137 | Good 47.2% |
| Pakistanis | 77.5 /100 | #138 | Good 47.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 77.4 /100 | #139 | Good 47.2% |
| Cajuns | 75.3 /100 | #140 | Good 47.1% |
| Venezuelans | 74.4 /100 | #141 | Good 47.1% |
| Argentineans | 74.4 /100 | #142 | Good 47.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 74.2 /100 | #143 | Good 47.1% |
| Hmong | 73.4 /100 | #144 | Good 47.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 72.9 /100 | #145 | Good 47.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 72.6 /100 | #146 | Good 47.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |