Ute vs Nicaraguan Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Ute
Nicaraguan
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Ute
Nicaraguans
7.1%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Nicaraguan Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,640,483 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,416,265 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 31.1% | 12.9% |
| Range | 28.6% | 12.4% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 6.8% |
| Median | 5.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Nicaraguans by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Panamanian (7.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Kiowa (7.1%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Panama (7.2%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Cambodia (7.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Dutch West Indian (7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Spanish American Indian (7.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Cuban (7.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bermudan (7.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
| Spanish Americans | 1.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Comanche | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Choctaw | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Bermudans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 7.3% |