Salvadoran vs Inupiat Female Disability
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Inupiat
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Salvadorans
Inupiat
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Inupiat Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,928,715 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.448 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 30.3% |
| Range | 9.9% | 26.9% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 11.8% |
| Median | 11.0% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Colombia (11.4%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |