Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Thai Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Thai
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Thais
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Thai Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,955,040 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,631,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Thai |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.18% |
| Maximum | 8.4% | 8.6% |
| Range | 7.4% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Thais by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Filipino (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |