Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Cambodian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Cambodian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Cambodians
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Cambodian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,955,040 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,504,705 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Cambodian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 8.4% | 16.9% |
Range | 7.4% | 16.7% |
Mean | 5.0% | 5.7% |
Median | 5.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Cambodians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |