Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ethiopian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Ethiopian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Ethiopians
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ethiopian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,955,040 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,167,947 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.47%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 8.4% | 9.8% |
Range | 7.4% | 9.6% |
Mean | 5.0% | 4.9% |
Median | 5.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |