Ecuadorian vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Chickasaw
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,801,764 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 44.4%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 19.6% | 56.8% |
| Range | 17.0% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 22.9% |
| Median | 9.5% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |