Australian vs Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Australian
Choctaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Australians
Choctaw
10.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,011,363 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,605,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 52.6%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 50.0% |
| Range | 34.3% | 47.8% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 26.3% |
| Median | 12.3% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 30.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Australians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |