Immigrants from Korea vs Bhutanese Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Bhutanese
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Bhutanese
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Bhutanese Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,464,791 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,760,879 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 19.2% | 13.7% |
| Range | 18.9% | 12.6% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Bhutanese by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Japan (4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Austrian (4.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Austrian (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Polish (4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Croatian (4.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Irish | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Jordanians | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.0% |