Ute vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Congo
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Congo
16.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,697 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,094,185 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 4.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 6.3% |
| Maximum | 66.0% | 41.0% |
| Range | 64.0% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 22.6% | 18.1% |
| Median | 15.9% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.4% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.5% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Immigrants from Congo by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Kiowa (16.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Paiute (16.7%, a difference of 0.96%), Central American Indian (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Yakama (16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and Colville (16.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Dominica (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Honduras (16.2%, a difference of 0.23%), U.S. Virgin Islander (16.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Arapaho (16.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and Honduran (15.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |