Spanish American Indian vs Asian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Asian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Asians
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Asian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,992,816 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,137,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 45.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Asian |
Minimum | 6.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 57.8% | 38.0% |
Range | 51.4% | 36.7% |
Mean | 22.2% | 11.5% |
Median | 18.8% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Asians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |