South African vs New Zealander Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
New Zealander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
New Zealanders
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs New Zealander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,893,684 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.62%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 44.9% | 35.3% |
| Range | 42.4% | 33.4% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 11.5% |
| Median | 9.7% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and New Zealanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |