Slovene vs European Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Slovene
European
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Slovenes
Europeans
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs European Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,332,040 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,040,111 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 0.040%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slovene | European |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.5% | 97.6% |
Mean | 17.2% | 29.9% |
Median | 13.6% | 17.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 36.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 27.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 27.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes and Europeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Austria (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Austria (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Taiwanese (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |