Palestinian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,720,256 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,356,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.72%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Palestinian	Immigrants from Malaysia
Minimum	0.56%	1.6%
Maximum	62.9%	57.7%
Range	62.3%	56.0%
Mean	17.9%	16.1%
Median	14.1%	13.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.1%	10.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.9%	18.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.8%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.8%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.6%	10.6%

Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Malaysia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| France	96.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.1 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
Basques	95.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
British	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| England	95.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.1%
Chileans	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	95.0 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Brazil	94.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 15.1%
Serbians	94.8 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	94.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 15.1%
Palestinians	94.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	94.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 15.1%
Dutch	94.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 15.1%
Sri Lankans	94.0 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Denmark	93.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 15.2%