Pakistani vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
Immigrants from Malaysia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
Immigrants from Malaysia
11.9%
POVERTY
82.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,215,631 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,932,153 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 0.75% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 43.1% | 41.8% |
Range | 42.4% | 39.3% |
Mean | 12.7% | 11.8% |
Median | 11.4% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Immigrants from Malaysia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Basque (11.9%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |