Native Hawaiian vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Yugoslavian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Yugoslavians
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,823,706 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 33.7% | 26.2% |
| Range | 30.7% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 9.3% |
| Median | 9.7% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Yugoslavians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), French (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Norway (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |