Marshallese vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Marshallese
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Marshallese
Slavs
18.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,733,335 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 18.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Slavic |
| Minimum | 8.7% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 80.7% |
| Range | 91.3% | 80.2% |
| Mean | 28.9% | 23.6% |
| Median | 19.2% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.5% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.3% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.3% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.3% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Eritrea (18.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |