Jamaican vs Immigrants from Barbados Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Immigrants from Barbados
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Immigrants from Barbados
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Immigrants from Barbados Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,761,871 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 2.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Immigrants from Barbados |
Minimum | 5.3% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 29.8% | 33.6% |
Range | 24.5% | 33.1% |
Mean | 15.4% | 14.4% |
Median | 15.0% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Immigrants from Barbados by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Barbados are Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |