Italian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Italians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 569,861,523 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,025,257 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 15.8% |
| Range | 98.5% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 5.4% |
| Median | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |