Immigrants from Egypt vs Sri Lankan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Sri Lankan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Sri Lankans
11.5%
POVERTY
94.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Sri Lankan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,409,377 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,138,450 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 41.8% | 47.9% |
Range | 40.5% | 47.2% |
Mean | 11.9% | 12.9% |
Median | 9.9% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Sri Lankans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Russia (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from China (11.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |