Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Native/Alaskan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Native/Alaskan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Natives/Alaskans
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Native/Alaskan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,451,408 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,255,067 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 62.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 1.5% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.0% |
Range | 98.5% | 70.7% |
Mean | 24.8% | 31.7% |
Median | 16.5% | 29.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 41.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 22.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.2% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 2.7%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and Colville (18.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |