Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chickasaw
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Chickasaw
15.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,442,330 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 20.2%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 6.3% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 93.7% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 30.2% | 31.9% |
| Median | 19.1% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.0% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.9% | 19.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.6% | 19.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Latvia (15.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (15.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Turkish (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Danish (15.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Argentinean (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Pakistanis | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Turks | 95.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 95.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Bulgarians | 94.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.7 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Danes | 94.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Argentineans | 94.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 92.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 92.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |